The golden trap of open access - (Gaol Road to Open Access) - Digital Still

abernard102@gmail.com 2016-01-17

Summary:

[From Google's English] "Transition vigorously debate towards open access, since the contribution of the Max Planck library. I translated, here, this contribution, not because I adhérais unqualified, but because it was a clear stance in a debate that fascinates me. I abstained to ramble my translation, fully expecting to have some echoes of reactions to the White Paper, and come back after reflection. I collected enough evidence to realize here that runs the controversy. Obviously I'm not the only one interested in the subject! I must also have some difficulty in forging my opinion, the ones I echo being as trenches rather than conflicting. Let's try anyway. For those seriously interested in the subject, the CNRS discussion paper 1 is to read. He mentions in passing (without any enthusiasm) the White Paper of Max Planck, but it reflects more widely on the issue of paying author. Returning to the position of Max Planck. It can be summarized as follows, in broad strokes ..."

Link:

http://alambic.hypotheses.org/5845

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.comment oa.french oa.reports oa.studies oa.max_planck_society oa.gold oa.conversions oa.economics_of oa.journals

Date tagged:

01/17/2016, 09:25

Date published:

01/17/2016, 04:25