Impact of Social Sciences – Breaking the traditional mould of peer review: Why we need a more transparent process of research evaluation.

abernard102@gmail.com 2016-03-20

Summary:

"Jon Tennant takes a look at the transformations underway aimed at tackling the widespread dissatisfaction with the system of peer review. He provides further background on the platform ScienceOpen, which seeks to enable a process of transparent, self-regulating, peer review, where knowledge sharing is encouraged, valued, and rewarded. By adopting a more transparent process of research evaluation, we move one step closer towards a fairer and democratic research process ..."

Link:

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2016/02/17/breaking-the-traditional-mould-of-peer-review/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.comment oa.peer_review oa.scienceopen oa.social_networks

Date tagged:

03/20/2016, 08:51

Date published:

03/20/2016, 04:51