Go To Hellman: A Rational Framework for Library eBook Licensing

abernard102@gmail.com 2013-08-13

Summary:

"Since the Redigi decision made it clear that there is no right of first sale for digital content in the US, it's been much easier to think up realistic doomsday scenarios for public libraries in the US. Why should a publisher let a public library lend an ebook if Amazon or some other competitor were to offer much better terms? How would our public library system, saddled with difficult-to-use systems and unfavorable contracts, ever hope to compete?  Back when HarperCollins first announced that it would only let libraries lend their ebooks 26 times before they would expire, there was widespread outrage from the library community. Looking back on that, it seems pretty clear that a lack of consultation and poor customer communication fueled the furor. By itself, the lending limit could have terrible long-term consequences for libraries, but as part of a wider, well-thought out framework, it could be useful component. I've been doing a lot of thinking about this over the last 3 years, and I've decided it's time to float a comprehensive proposal for how libraries and publishers might work together on ebook distribution to benefit the entire reading ecosystem. eBook lending as implemented to date has been founded on a combination of irrational fears and outmoded processes. We deserve better ..."

Link:

http://go-to-hellman.blogspot.com/2013/08/a-rational-framework-for-library-ebook.html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.business_models oa.publishers oa.policies oa.licensing oa.comment oa.usa oa.copyright oa.libraries oa.preservation oa.books oa.litigation oa.librarians oa.prices oa.fees oa.drm oa.harpercollins oa.redigi oa.libre oa.cdl

Date tagged:

08/13/2013, 16:45

Date published:

08/13/2013, 12:45