CC-BY dominates under the Creative Commons licensed journals in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) › Hybrid Publishing Lab Notepad
abernard102@gmail.com 2014-02-13
Summary:
If we consider the subset of journals that use any CC license that the claims of the Open Definition sufficient licenses dominate even slightly: About 54% of all journals that use a CC license , use either CC-BY ( 52.77 %) or CC-BY-SA (1.40 %). Surprisingly low is the proportion of journals which use the most restrictive CC license CC-BY-NC-ND : Only 737 journals (7.52 % of all journals and 19.80% under the CC-licensed journals). This license variant neither allows edits or allows to create derivative works (such as translations) nor a commercial use is possible. Surprisingly allow more than half (2,060, 55.35 %) of which is under a CC license Journals a commercial exploitation of the contents, only 44.65% (1662) prohibit this. The bad news: if you look at these numbers you will still find most of the publications listed in the DOAJ are using non-commercial and non-derivatives licenses which are not open in Terms of the Definition of 'Open'. This is a fundamental issue on how all of us present, practice and communicate Open Access. Please be aware of open washing and consider this before you just pretend to publish 'open'…"