Anti-Open Access Bill Dies | The Scientist

abernard102@gmail.com 2012-08-20

Summary:

“Just hours after publishing giant Elsevier withdrew its support of the Research Works Act (RWA)—a bill introduced into the US House of Representatives late last year that would do away with federal policies like the National Institutes of Health’s public access policy that require grantees to post their peer-reviewed manuscripts online in open-access forums—its sponsors pronounced the bill dead. Representatives Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), who introduced the legislation last December, said on Monday (Feb 27) that the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee would drop the RWA, officially known as HR 3699. “We will not be taking legislative action on HR 3699, the Research Works Act,” they said in a statement. Open-access advocates are hailing the move as a victory, and it does seem that the RWA’s sponsors realize the rise of the open-access model of publishing scientific literature. Competing legislation introduced into both the House and Senate earlier this month—the latest version of the Federal Research Public Access Act (FRPAA), which like the RWA had been introduced into the legislature several times in the past—is still alive and kicking...”

Link:

http://the-scientist.com/2012/02/29/anti-open-access-bill-dies/

Updated:

08/16/2012, 06:08

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.business_models oa.publishers oa.comment oa.mandates oa.usa oa.frpaa oa.legislation oa.rwa oa.nih oa.advocacy oa.elsevier oa.copyright oa.policies

Authors:

abernard

Date tagged:

08/20/2012, 14:44

Date published:

03/01/2012, 13:48