Azimuth

abernard102@gmail.com 2012-10-19

Summary:

After academics worldwide began a boycott against Elsevier, this publisher claimed it would mend its ways and treat mathematicians better. Why just mathematicians? Maybe they didn’t notice that only 17% of the researchers boycotting them are mathematicians. More likely, they’re trying a ‘divide and conquer’ strategy. Despite their placating gestures, the overall problem persists: Elsevier’s business model is to get very smart people to work for free, then sell their results back to them at high and ever-rising prices. Does that sound sustainable to you? It works better than you might think, because they have control over many journals that academics want, and they sell these journals in big ‘bundles’, so you can’t stop buying just some of them. In short, they have monopoly power. Worse, the people who actually buy the journals are not the academics, but university libraries. Librarians are very nice people. They want to keep their customers—the academics—happy. So they haven’t been very good at saying what they should: 'Okay, you want to raise your prices? Fine, we’ll stop subscribing to all your journals until you lower them!'  And so, libraries world-wide are slowly being strangled by Elsevier. A while back, when the economic crisis hit here at U. C. Riverside, our library’s budget was cut. Journals eat up most of the budget, but librarians felt they couldn’t drop subscriptions to all the Elsevier journals, and Elsevier’s practice of bundling meant they couldn’t drop just some of them. The only ways to cut costs were to cut library hours, lay off staff, cut journals published by smaller—and cheaper!—publishers, and buy fewer books. Books can always be bought later… in theory… so they took the biggest hit. Our book budget was slashed to about a tenth of its original level! The people most hurt were not mathematicians or scientists, but people working in the humanities. They’re the ones who use books the most.  And here’s a shocking story I recently got in my email. I’ll paraphrase, because the details of cases like this are kept secret thanks to Elsevier’s legal tactics...  I hope you see why we all need to boycott Elsevier. Stop publishing our papers with them, stop refereeing papers for them, stop working as editors for them, and convince your librarian that it’s okay to unsubscribe to their journals. Please go to this website and join over 12,000 top researchers in this boycott..."

Link:

http://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.business_models oa.publishers oa.comment oa.ssh oa.signatures oa.petitions oa.elsevier oa.libraries oa.books oa.librarians oa.prices oa.budgets oa.cancellations oa.u.c._riverside oa.advocacy oa.boycotts

Date tagged:

10/19/2012, 14:14

Date published:

10/19/2012, 10:14