A framework for assessing the trustworthiness of scientific research findings1 | PNAS

peter.suber's bookmarks 2026-02-08

Summary:

Abstract:  Vigorous debate has erupted over the trustworthiness of scientific research findings in a number of domains. The question “what makes research findings trustworthy?” elicits different answers depending on whether the emphasis is on research integrity and ethics, research methods, transparency, inclusion, assessment and peer review, or scholarly communication. Each provides partial insight. We offer a systems approach that focuses on whether the research is accountable, evaluable, well-formulated, has been evaluated, controls for bias, reduces error, and whether the claims are warranted by the evidence. We tie each of these components to measurable indicators of trustworthiness for evaluating the research itself, the researchers conducting the research, and the organizations supporting the research. Our goals are to offer a framework that can be applied across methods, approaches, and disciplines and to foster innovation in development of trustworthiness indicators. Developing valid indicators will improve the conduct and assessment of research and, ultimately, public understanding and trust.

From the body of the paper: "This Trustworthiness Framework for Assessing Research Findings integrates trustworthiness perspectives across domains that include: research integrity and ethics, research methods, research transparency and openness, research inclusivity, research assessment and peer review, and research communication."

Link:

https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2536736123

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.trust oa.quality oa.credibility oa.reproducibility oa.scholcomm oa.assessment oa.open_science oa.data oa.code oa.coara oa.helios oa.recommendations oa.best_practices

Date tagged:

02/08/2026, 10:00

Date published:

02/08/2026, 05:02