Expertos reclaman revisar el sistema de evaluación de los investigadores para impulsar la ciencia abierta - Noticia - ISGLOBAL

peter.suber's bookmarks 2018-10-18

Summary:

"October 9, 2018

The review of the evaluation system of the research staff is essential to promote open science

The review of the evaluation system of the research staff is essential to promote open science

ISGlobal co-organizes a B · Debate on open science in the Spanish context and in Europe Experts and experts, convened by B · Debate , an initiative of Biocat and Obra Social "la Caixa", agreed that the review of the evaluation system of research personnel is essential to promote open science , a movement that promotes a science more accessible to everyone, that is effective, reproducible and transparent.

 

Currently, many times the evaluation of a researcher's career continues to focus on the number of publications and the impact factor of the scientific journals where his articles appear. Different international movements have already underlined the importance of revising this system to improve the way in which the quality of the results and the impact of the research are evaluated , such as the San Francisco Declaration of Evaluation of Research . Apart from the quantity, the evaluation of the research must also take into account the quality...."

Link:

https://www.isglobal.org/new/-/asset_publisher/JZ9fGljXnWpI/content/la-revision-del-sistema-de-evaluacion-es-el-primer-paso-para-impulsar-la-ciencia-abierta

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.p&t oa.open_science oa.quality oa.recommendations oa.spanish oa.dora oa.impact oa.jif oa.metrics oa.self_archiving

Date tagged:

10/18/2018, 15:15

Date published:

10/18/2018, 11:15