Please Comment on Mandate Proposal by President Obama's Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)

Amsciforum 2013-03-10

Summary:

It is extremely important to require institutional instead of central deposit (which is what several funders require now, e.g., NIH requires central deposit in PubMedCentral, PMC). Institutional deposits can be easily and automatically harvested or imported into central collections and services like PMC (or Scirus or OAIster or Citeseer, or, for that matter, Google Scholar and Google). The NIH requirement to deposit in PubMedCentral (PMC) is an extremely counterproductive handicap, needlessly slowing down the growth of public access for no good reason at all. Institutions (universities and research institutes) are the universal providers of all research output, funded and unfunded, across all fields. If funders mandate institutional deposit, they encourage and reinforce universalizing the adoption of institutional public access mandates across all their fundees' institutions (and they gain a powerful ally in monitoring and ensuring compliance with the funder mandates).

Link:

http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/672-Please-Comment-on-Mandate-Proposal-by-President-Obamas-Office-of-Science-and-Technology-Policy-OSTP.html

Updated:

10/18/2010, 05:30

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ยป Amsciforum

Tags:

oa.mandates oa.green institutional mandates president obama oa.new oa.frpaa oa.ir oa.nih oa.repositories oa.policies oa.ostp

Authors:

stevanharnad

Date tagged:

03/10/2013, 13:08

Date published:

12/10/2009, 09:19