Home Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) lkfitz's bookmarks Critical study of the new ways of ”editorialising” open access scientific journals

Critical study of the new ways of ”editorialising” open access scientific journals

lkfitz's bookmarks 2016-11-30

Summary:

"Today, the debate is moving from an assessment of the principle of open access towards a more specific discussion of the possible models. The question is no longer “Should we move to open access?”, but rather: “What type of open access do we want?” "

Link:

https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01399286/document

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lkfitz's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.gold oa.france oa.legislation oa.disciplines oa.embargoes oa.funding oa.europe oa.publishing oa.debates oa.fees oa.economics_of oa.conversions oa.peer_review oa.p&t oa.tools oa.software oa.floss oa.data oa.formats oa.recommendations oa.green oa.costs oa.business_models oa.infrastructure oa.reports oa.repositories oa.journals

Date tagged:

11/30/2016, 17:47

Date published:

11/30/2016, 12:47