bjoern.brembs.blog » Why open access Big Deals are worse than subscriptions

lkfitz's bookmarks 2018-04-13

Summary:

"Notwithstanding the barrage of criticisms and warnings from every corner of the scholarly community, various initiatives, mainly in the Netherlands, Finland, Germany, France and the UK, continue their efforts for a smooth transition from subscriptions to open access without any further disruptions. The underlying idea is to shift the subscription funds to article processing charges (APCs). While most share the sentiment that subscriptions need to go and the saved funds should be used for publishing, rather than reading, this particular approach has drawn widespread criticism."

Link:

http://bjoern.brembs.net/2018/04/why-open-access-big-deals-are-worse-than-subscriptions/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lkfitz's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.comment oa.sustainability oa.fees oa.costs oa.publishers oa.publishing oa.budgets oa.funds oa.prestige oa.obstacles oa.libraries oa.cancellations oa.offsets oa.economics_of

Date tagged:

04/13/2018, 11:40

Date published:

04/13/2018, 07:40