Opening the Publication Process with Executable Research Compendia

lterrat's bookmarks 2017-01-16

Summary:

"A strong movement towards openness has seized science. Open data and methods, open source software, Open Access, open reviews, and open research platforms provide the legal and technical solutions to new forms of research and publishing. However, publishing reproducible research is still not common practice. Reasons include a lack of incentives and a missing standardized infrastructure for providing research material such as data sets and source code together with a scientific paper. Therefore we first study fundamentals and existing approaches. On that basis, our key contributions are the identification of core requirements of authors, readers, publishers, curators, as well as preservationists and the subsequent description of an executable research compendium (ERC). It is the main component of a publication process providing a new way to publish and access computational research. ERCs provide a new standardisable packaging mechanism which combines data, software, text, and a user interface description. We discuss the potential of ERCs and their challenges in the context of user requirements and the established publication processes. We conclude that ERCs provide a novel potential to find, explore, reuse, and archive computer-based research."

Link:

http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january17/nuest/01nuest.html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lterrat's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.case oa.open_science oa.publishing oa.reproducibility oa.data oa.recommendations oa.incentives oa.infrastructure oa.obstacles oa.authors oa.erc

Date tagged:

01/16/2017, 18:31

Date published:

01/16/2017, 13:31