A Critique of Slow Archaeology | The Archaeology of the Mediterranean World

lterrat's bookmarks 2017-05-21


"I still think about slow archaeology a good bit and even more these days as I get my feet set for my 21st season of archaeological field work. So I was pretty excited to read Andre Costopoulos’s recent post at ArcheoThoughts titled 'the traditional prestige economy of archaeology is preventing its emergence as an open science.'


At the same time, openness is not absolute, and archaeology will always be a funny kind of science. There is a kind of embodied knowledge that passes down through the discipline that will likely resist the kind of openness that certain kinds of bench sciences celebrate. There are, however, ways to mitigate the unintended consequences of the knowledge gain through archaeological experience, deep familiarity, and various ways of 'knowing the material.' I will continue to contend that part of the way in which slow archaeology contributes is through a critical engagement with all aspects of knowledge production. It may be that critiques like this one are crucial for understanding the function of open science within academic life, and, perhaps, is some ways, this blog post (and other arguments like it) is as valuable for framing a disconnect in archaeological knowledge making as offering a clear solution."



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lterrat's bookmarks


oa.new oa.comment oa.ssh oa.archaeology oa.open_science oa.debates

Date tagged:

05/21/2017, 23:08

Date published:

05/21/2017, 19:08