Flexible models for funding open access in journal publishing | Cristobal Cobo

abernard102@gmail.com 2014-11-07


"One of the main challenges that the Open Access movement faces is to explore (more) economically sustainable models to embrace and support an inclusive openness (not only for a few). In this post we present a work-in-progress including nine remarkable cases that pursue OA and flexible funding models. An overview of this benchmark comparing these nine different funding models adopted to promote Open Access shows that although most of them are significantly subsidised is interesting to see how their approaches are complementary and not mutually exclusive. Common patterns are also: low fees, reduced fees for low-income countries, adoption of Creative Commons licences, as well as flexibility. This benchmark includes the following cases: Public Library of Science (PLoS ONE), Ubiquity Press, PeerJ, Open Library of Humanities, Co-Action Publishing, African Journals OnLine (AJOL), SCOAP3 consortium, eLife and F1000Research. [details provided in SlideShare or GoogleDrive]. Here a summary of this revision ..."



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ┬╗ abernard102@gmail.com


oa.new oa.comment oa.publishers oa.business_models oa.gold oa.sustainability oa.case oa.scoap3 oa.plos oa.peerj oa.open_library_humanities oa.ubiquity oa.ajol oa.co-action_publishing oa.elife oa.f1000research oa.journals oa.economics_of

Date tagged:

11/07/2014, 09:56

Date published:

11/07/2014, 04:56