The five deadly sins of science publishing - F1000Research

abernard102@gmail.com 2015-05-13

Summary:

"Science cannot progress without scientists reporting their findings. And yet researchers have given control of this central pillar of the scientific process to science publishers, who are in the business of serving the interests of their journals; these are not always the same as the interests of science. This editorial describes the problems with the process of preparing and publishing research findings, and with judging their veracity and significance, and then explains how we at Faculty of 1000 are starting to tackle the ‘deadly sins’ of science publishing."

Link:

http://f1000research.com/articles/4-112/v1

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.publishing oa.quality oa.credibility oa.peer_review oa.impact oa.prestige oa.f1000research oa.journals oa.publishers oa.business_models oa.data oa.editorials

Date tagged:

05/13/2015, 08:24

Date published:

05/13/2015, 04:24