Omnibus Bill means a win for Open Access » MobyLives

abernard102@gmail.com 2014-01-24

Summary:

"Tucked inside the $1 trillion bill that passed earlier this week, the 2014 Omnibus Appropriations Bill, is a crucial development for the Open Access movement in the United States. The bill requires all federal agencies under the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and the Department of Education with research budgets of $100 million or more to provide the public with online access to articles resulting from federally funded research, within 12 months of publication in a peer-reviewed journal. This is a significant legal advance, since previously only the National Institutes of Health faced similar requirements, and it marks a major step away from flimsier memoranda and recommendations, like the February 2013 White House directive on Open Access (discussed in this Moby post). OA advocates were excited: Heather Joseph, Executive Director of the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC), said “This is an important step toward making federally funded scientific research available for everyone to use online at no cost,” and the Electronic Frontier Foundation called it “a huge win.” Of course, it’s not only important that these policies apply to a greater swathe of federal agencies, but that the terms of those policies allow for freedom of access in many different ways. And seen in this light, the bill falls somewhat short of the terms in the proposed FASTR Act, another OA bill on the table. Peter Suber, OA advocate extraordinaire, compared them point by point on his blog: –weaker by allowing embargoes up to 12 months (FASTR caps embargoes at 6 months)  –the same in applying to all work funded 'in whole or in part' by a covered federal agency  –the same in applying to the author’s peer-reviewed manuscript  –the same in not applying to data  –weaker by not requiring reuse rights or open licenses  –the same in requiring deposit in repositories (green OA), not submission to OA journals (gold OA)  –stronger by being enacted legislation  –weaker by applying to just one fiscal year (though it could later be modified to become permanent, this happened to the NIH policy)  –weaker by applying to fewer agencies' ..."

Link:

http://www.mhpbooks.com/omnibus-bill-means-a-win-for-open-access/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.comment oa.chorus oa.aap oa.publishers oa.fastr oa.omnibus_appropriations_2014 oa.usa oa.legislation oa.green oa.funders oa.embargoes oa.copyright oa.licensing oa.repositories oa.libre

Date tagged:

01/24/2014, 19:16

Date published:

01/24/2014, 14:16