Open Peer-review Model for Publishing Scientific Results « Homologus

abernard102@gmail.com 2013-01-09

Summary:

Use the link to access the full text article introduced as follows: "Regular readers know that we are not only big supporters of open-access publication and arxiv.org, we see them as natural outcomes due to progress in communication technology. In fact most traditional journals are still surviving because of help from dinosaurs otherwise known as funding agencies, who give more priority to one form of publication (paper) than others (software, database, website, blog, twitter, seqanswers). Two months back, we learned about Gigascience from a colleague and liked their ‘zero publication charge’ model. They are also trying to push the boundary in other ways, and the following commentary, cross-posted with permission from Scott Edmunds’ blog at Gigascience, explains how."

Link:

http://www.homolog.us/blogs/2013/01/07/open-peer-review-model-for-publishing-scientific-results/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.data oa.gold oa.comment oa.advocacy oa.peer_review oa.arxiv oa.quality oa.tools oa.funders oa.fees oa.reproducibility oa.embo oa.gigascience oa.elife oa.soap oa.f1000research oa.peerk oa.journals

Date tagged:

01/09/2013, 10:32

Date published:

01/09/2013, 05:32