Scholarly Literature in Digital Humanities: A Comparative Analysis of Open Access and Non-Open Access Publications

peter.suber's bookmarks 2025-02-07

Summary:

Abstract:  Digital Humanities (DH), as a research area, has attracted the attention of scholars across the globe. The present study attempts to trace the publication and citation trends in DH literature with a comparative analysis of Open Access (OA) and Non-Open Access (Non-OA) publications using a dataset of 3,731 publications collected from Scopus. DH literature is characterized by a steady growth from 1971 to 2024. The highest number of publications have been produced during 2022 (475). Although a consistent increase in OA publications can be witnessed since 2009, a significant portion of DH literature (65%) is non-open access. In terms of citations, OA publications show greater potential. Mann Whitney U test shows that the mean rank of citation counts for OA publications (2036.47) is higher than that of non-OA publications (1772.56). The result is statistically significant (p-value=.000). Green OA is the most preferred OA channel, with 27% of OA publications. USA is the top contributor to DH literature with 23% of publications, while Belgium tops the list with 62% open access publication output. Computer Science (48%) is the most predominant subject area in DH. Articles and conference papers constitute 86% of the total literature, indicating authors’ preference for scholarly communication.

 

Link:

https://www.dline.info/ijis/fulltext/v17n1/ijisv17n1_5.pdf

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.humanities oa.digital_humanities oa.comparisons oa.scholcomm oa.citations oa.impact oa.advantage oa.ssh

Date tagged:

02/07/2025, 10:16

Date published:

02/07/2025, 05:16