What should we do now Beall’s List has gone?

peter.suber's bookmarks 2017-01-26

Summary:

"It’s now been widely discussed that Jeffrey Beall’s list of predatory and questionable open-access publishers — Beall’s List for short — has suddenly and abruptly gone away. No-one really knows why, but there are rumblings that he has been hit with a legal threat that he doesn’t want to defend.

To get this out of the way: it’s always a bad thing when legal threats make information quietly disappear; to that extent, at least, Beall has my sympathy.

That said — over all, I think making Beall’s List was probably not a good thing to do in the first place, being an essentially negative approach, as opposed to DOAJ’s more constructive whitelisting approach. But under Beall’s sole stewardship it was a disaster, due to his well-known ideological opposition to all open access. So I think it’s a net win that the list is gone.

But, more than that, I would prefer that it not be replaced...."

Link:

https://svpow.com/2017/01/26/what-should-we-do-now-bealls-list-has-gone/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.predatory oa.quality oa.credibility oa.gold oa.journals

Date tagged:

01/26/2017, 14:20

Date published:

01/26/2017, 09:20