Science is Shaped by Wikipedia: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial by Neil Thompson, Douglas Hanley :: SSRN

peter.suber's bookmarks 2017-09-20

Summary:

"As the largest encyclopedia in the world, it is not surprising that Wikipedia reflects the state of scientific knowledge. However, Wikipedia is also one of the most accessed websites in the world, including by scientists, which suggests that it also has the potential to shape science. This paper shows that it does.

Incorporating ideas into Wikipedia leads to those ideas being used more in the scientific literature. We provide correlational evidence of this across thousands of Wikipedia articles and causal evidence of it through a randomized control trial where we add new scientific content to Wikipedia. In the months after uploading it, an average new Wikipedia article in Chemistry is read tens of thousands of times and causes changes to hundreds of related scientific journal articles. Patterns in these changes suggest that Wikipedia articles are used as review articles, summarizing an area of science and highlighting the research contributions to it. Consistent with this reference article view, we find causal evidence that when scientific articles are added as references to Wikipedia, those articles accrue more academic citations. Our findings speak not only to the influence of Wikipedia, but more broadly to the influence of repositories of knowledge and the role that they play in science."

Link:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3039505

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lkfitz's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.wikipedia oa.stem oa.green oa.benefits oa.repositories oa.impact oa.quality oa.lay oa.advantage oa.citations

Date tagged:

09/20/2017, 10:25

Date published:

09/20/2017, 06:56