A change of plan for UK open access? | Wonkhe | Policy Watch

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-02-05


"So for me the headline advice expected in a report to the minister from Adam Tickell is that the current ‘preference for Gold OA is expensive – and there is a need for clarity as to whether the UK should maintain this approach....' 

The fact that Gold OA comes at a cost is a clear disincentive for many researchers despite being a REF requirement – especially where a grant may not cover publication costs or where interesting work is being carried out without a grant. The research councils currently provide block funding for APCs, but this is unlikely to be a permanent feature – we might see a short extension, but only if the Gold OA policy direction continues.

If it does, and if we assume that current price trends and publishing patterns continue – and that OA take-up in the UK were to reach 100% by 2025 – total expenditure would rise to £362m in 2020, and £818m in 2028 – over three times the 2016 figure in real terms. We understand there’ll be some economic modelling published alongside Tickell’s advice, which looks at these figures across a variety of scenarios...."



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks


oa.new oa.uk oa.plan_s oa.gold oa.fees oa.finch_report oa.green oa.offsets oa.dora oa.ref oa.repositories oa.journals

Date tagged:

02/05/2019, 10:59

Date published:

02/05/2019, 05:59