‘Predatory’ Scientific Publisher Is Hit With a $50 Million Judgment - The New York Times

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-04-04


"In the world of scientific research, they are pernicious impostors. So-called predatory journals, online publications with official-sounding names, publish virtually anything, even gibberish, that an academic researcher submits — for a fee.

Critics have long maintained that these journals are eroding scientific credibility and wasting grant money. But academics must publish research to further their careers, and the number of questionable outlets has exploded.

Now the Federal Trade Commission has stepped in, announcing on Wednesday that it has won a $50 million court judgment against Omics International of Hyderabad, India, and its owner, Srinubabu Gedela.

Omics publishes hundreds of journals in such areas as medicine, chemistry and engineering. It also organizes conferences. The F.T.C. claimed that Omics violated the agency’s prohibition on deceptive business practices...."



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks


oa.new oa.misconduct oa.litigation oa.usa oa.usa.ftc oa.omics oa.predatory oa.journals

Date tagged:

04/04/2019, 13:41

Date published:

04/04/2019, 09:41