'Access is not really the main issue anymore' | Research Information

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-04-17


"The biggest challenge is the circularity of the entire structure of how we communicate with each other: things are tied up in a way that makes it very difficult to break up. The publishers, librarians, and faculty scientists all have very different perspectives, and it’s very difficult to cooperate when everyone has different perspectives and different interests. In a short phrase: it’s a social problem. 

Libraries, for instance, say “we would instantly drop our subscriptions, if we knew that faculty would be publishing elsewhere” because they don’t realise that if we publish elsewhere we risk our jobs. You just have to look up job ads for faculty or tenure track positions, and you’ll see we have to publish in certain journals if you want that job. Usually librarians are quite aghast or surprised when I tell them that this is the choice we have, they seem to see it as some subliminal self-stroking ego if we publish in certain journals. If one looks at our journal system and most journals that virtually guarantee you a job, those are journals that are also publishing the least reliable science. If you’ve done that for the last 30 years, then maybe it’s no surprise that we’re wondering about the reliability of science...."



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks


oa.new oa.access oa.interviews oa.people oa.obstacles oa.scholcomm oa.recommendations oa.speed oa.libraries oa.publishers

Date tagged:

04/17/2019, 15:39

Date published:

04/17/2019, 11:39