Digital Content vs. Digital Access | Digital Tweed

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-08-03

Summary:

"All good, it would seem.  These strategies suggest lower cost, “fresher” (or constantly improving) curricular content along with better options for Day One access.   After all, textbook prices are the low-hanging fruit (and publishers the villains) in one component of the continuing public anger and angst about college costs.  So strategies that promise to reduce costs and enhance Day One access are good things.

And yet, going digital or digital first strategies may actually disadvantage large numbers of low-income, full- and part-time undergraduates, primarily enrolled in community colleges or public four-year comprehensives, who are the intended beneficiaries of these initiatives.  As shown below, there is consistent and significant concern from faculty, from provosts/Chief Academic Officers, and from CIOs, about digital access as a key issue in the process of going digital...."

Link:

http://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/digital-tweed/digital-content-vs-digital-access

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.risks oa.obstacles oa.textbooks oa.students oa.prices oa.oer oa.books

Date tagged:

08/03/2019, 14:21

Date published:

08/03/2019, 10:21