Taylor & Francis input to UKRI Open Access Review - Taylor & Francis Newsroom

peter.suber's bookmarks 2020-06-01


"We urge UKRI to focus on requiring immediate access only to the final published research output or version of record, with the certainty this OA route provides of research being trusted, validated, discoverable, curated and preserved in perpetuity. We believe that a permissive policy approach is the best way to achieve UKRI’s aims. Encouraging a diverse ecology will help support the development of innovative models and diversification of existing models, will accelerate the growth in OA and will allow new entrants to join the research communication ecosystem, encouraging competition. As we have outlined in our response, the zero embargo Green OA route is an unsustainable mechanism that implies creation of content that is not paid for. This actually runs counter to UKRI’s long term aspirations around opening up research outputs....

We encourage future OA policy in the UK to support a variety of publication venues, including those most preferred by their communities, irrespective of their open access model, as they are the vehicles that drive research, being used and trusted by their communities. We are exploring options for hybrid journals other than the APC-OA model that will allow them to make their publications more widely available. We are keen to explore with UKRI, other funders, and researchers how we can best support these journals as they move to OA, and how we can offer sustainable publication venues across disciplines...."



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks


oa.new oa.ukri oa.consultations oa.versions oa.societies oa.gold oa.green oa.embargoes oa.business_models oa.no-fee oa.hybrid oa.taylor&francis oa.repositories oa.journals

Date tagged:

06/01/2020, 08:37

Date published:

06/01/2020, 04:37