Contrasting the open access dissemination of COVID-19 and SDG research | bioRxiv

peter.suber's bookmarks 2023-05-23


Abstract:  This paper examines the extent to which research has been published open access in response to two global threats: COVID-19 and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including climate change. We compare the accessibility of COVID-19 content versus SDG literature using the Dimensions database between 2000 and 2021, classifying each publication as gold open access, green, bronze, hybrid, or closed. We found that 79.9% of COVID-19 research papers published between January 2020 and December 2021 was open access, with 39.0% published with gold open access licenses. In contrast, just 55.7% of SDG papers were open access in the same time period, with only 36.0% published with gold open access licenses. Papers related to the climate emergency overall had the second-lowest level of open access at just 55.5%. Papers published by the largest for-profit publishers that committed to both the SDG Publishers Compact and climate actions were not predominantly published open access. The paper highlights the need for continued efforts to promote open access publishing to facilitate scientific research and technological development to address global challenges.



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags: oa.comparisons oa.medicine oa.climate oa.sdgs oa.humanities oa.growth oa.ssh

Date tagged:

05/23/2023, 16:13

Date published:

05/23/2023, 12:13