Researchers boycott publisher; will they embrace instant publishing?

Connotea Imports 2012-07-31


"Many scientists were miffed by the introduction of the Research Works Act, which would roll back the US government's open access policy for research it funds. Some of that annoyance was directed toward the commercial publishers that were supporting the bill. That, combined with a series of grievances about the pricing policies of one publisher, Elsevier, has now led a number of scientists to start a boycott—they won't publish in or review for journals from that publisher....Now, Faculty of 1000 is launching F1000 research, which is a different twist on academic publishing. When a manuscript is submitted to F1000R, an editor will provide a basic sanity check and, if it passes, the paper will immediately be published under a Creative Commons license. Only after it's online will the journal arrange for reviewers to perform peer review on it. Reviewers' scope will be limited to the scientific validity of the results and won't include an evaluation of the paper's significance. Other researchers will be able to attach comments to the paper that will act a bit like informal reviews. F1000R will also host any large datasets associated with the publications....A number of people commenting online have compared this service to the arXiv...."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Connotea Imports

Tags: oa.comment oa.usa oa.legislation oa.rwa oa.boycotts oa.copyright oa.peer_review oa.arxiv oa.pledges



Date tagged:

07/31/2012, 11:46

Date published:

02/01/2012, 22:01