Interpreting Michigan v. EPA

Legal Planet: Environmental Law and Policy 2015-07-01

Summary:

In bringing the mercury rule to the Supreme Court, industry was hoping for a ruling that EPA had to balance costs and benefits (and could only include benefits relating to mercury).  What they got was far less than that.  Here, I’d like to address some key questions about the opinion. 1.  When does EPA have […]

Link:

http://legal-planet.org/2015/06/29/interpreting-michigan-v-epa/

From feeds:

Berkeley Law Library -- Reference & Research Services » Legal Planet: Environmental Law and Policy

Tags:

air pollution toxic substances supreme court regulatory policy regulation pollution & health mercury rule cost benefit analysis air quality

Authors:

Dan Farber

Date tagged:

07/01/2015, 04:12

Date published:

06/29/2015, 21:11