Rick Rylance (CEO, AHRC) on RCUK on Green (and Embargoes)

Amsciforum 2013-03-10

Summary:

Rick Rylance (CEO, AHRC) in Independent onRCUK policy: "because we recognise that… the… pay-to-publish "gold" model of Open Access.. is not always available, we've retained a mixed model for the time being. This means that if there is not a to pay-to-publish option, researchers can opt for the "green" model of open access where the paper would be available via a repository after an embargo period… [emphasis added] --- Why "for the time being"? --- Why (cost-free) Green only if (paid) Gold unavailable? Why is Green described as embargoed when over 60% of journals (including the top journals in most fields) already endorse immediate, unembargoed Green (and "Almost OA" is available for the remaining 40%)? --- Is RCUK trying to encourage publishers to increase their Green OA embargoes?

Link:

http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/939-Rick-Rylance-CEO,-AHRC-on-RCUK-on-Green-and-Embargoes.html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Amsciforum

Tags:

oa.new oa.gold oa.mandates oa.green oa.humanities oa.finch_report oa.rcuk oa.repositories oa.policies oa.ssh oa.journals

Authors:

stevanharnad

Date tagged:

03/10/2013, 12:22

Date published:

09/27/2012, 12:47