Serious Potential Bug in RCUK Open Access Mandate

Amsciforum 2013-03-10

Summary:

There is the distinct possibility that RCUK's mixed either/or policy provides an incentive to publishers -- even the publishers of the 60% of journals that already endorse immediate, un-embargoed Green OA today -- to change their policy so as to offer a high-priced hybrid Gold OA option, coupled with an infinitely long Green OA embargo, in order to ensure that the RCUK author must pay for hybrid Gold OA. This would be a terrible, unintended consequence of the RCUK policy, and a huge blow to OA and Green OA worldwide. If the RCUK is not patched, then I predict a tremendous (and justified) researcher revolt against the policy, with the result that the policy will not be complied with, and will have to be revised after a few lost fallow years of failure. PATCH: Allow embargoed deposit and reliance on the repository's automated "email-eprint-request" Button to provide "Almost OA" during the embargo via one click from the user to request an individual copy for research purposes, and one click form the author to comply.

Link:

http://www.economist.com/node/21559317/comments#comment-1539479

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ยป Amsciforum

Tags:

oa.new oa.gold oa.mandates oa.green oa.finch_report oa.rcuk oa.repositories oa.policies oa.journals

Authors:

stevanharnad

Date tagged:

03/10/2013, 12:25

Date published:

07/25/2012, 11:11