Science Magazine: Letters About the Evans & Reimer Open Access Study

Amsciforum 2013-03-10

Summary:

Five months after the fact, this week's Science Magazine has just published four letters and a response about Evans & Reimer's Open Access and Global Participation in Science, Science 20 February 2009: 1025. You might want to also take a peek at these three rather more detailed critiques that Science did not publish...: "Open Access Benefits for the Developed and Developing World: The Harvards and the Have-Nots" "The Evans & Reimer OA Impact Study: A Welter of Misunderstandings" "Perils of Press-Release Journalism: NSF, U. Chicago, and Chronicle of Higher Education"

Link:

http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/608-Science-Magazine-Letters-on-the-Evans-Reimer-Study.html

Updated:

10/18/2010, 05:30

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ยป Amsciforum

Tags:

developing world oa.new oa.impact scientometrics self-archiving oa.embargoes

Authors:

stevanharnad

Date tagged:

03/10/2013, 13:18

Date published:

07/18/2009, 19:56