OSTP: On Not Putting the Fox in Charge of the Henhouse - Open Access Archivangelism

Amsciforum 2013-10-24

Summary:

#1 Who must make the paper OA? the fundee or the publisher? Obviously for a uniform, systematically verifiable mandate, it must be the fundee, the one bound by the mandate, and not the publisher, the one that is in conflict of interest with the mandate, and not bound to comply with it (except if paid extra money). #2 Where must the paper be made OA? Here again, for a uniform, systematically verifiable mandate, it must be in one verifiable locus, and the only locus shared by all fundees, all funders and all institutions (and for both Green and Gold OA) is the fundee's own institutional repository - from whence it can be exported or harvested to other sites, such as PubMed Central, if and when needed. #3 When must the paper be made OA? (The mandate already stipulates this: within 12 months of publication at the latest.) #4 When must the paper be deposited? This is the most important question of all, and carries with it the answer to the other questions: the fundee must deposit the final, refereed, accepted draft, immediately upon acceptance for publication -- not 12 months after publication -- irrespective of whether it is published in a subscription journal or a Gold OA journal, irrespective of whether the deposit is immediately made OA or embargoed, and irrespective of whether the journal endorses immediate OA or imposes an OA embargo.

Link:

http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/1067-OSTP-On-Not-Putting-the-Fox-in-Charge-of-the-Henhouse.html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Amsciforum

Tags:

oa.new oa.ostp

Date tagged:

10/24/2013, 21:34

Date published:

10/24/2013, 17:34