Finch II defends Finch I (but HEFCE/REF to the Rescue, as recommended by BIS)

Amsciforum 2013-11-20

Summary:

The Finch review now endorses the importance of author choice, which is also reflected in the funding councils’ draft open-access mandate for the research excellence framework.  The HEFCE draft open-access mandate thereby effectively fixes the Finch/RCUK mandate by requiring immediate institutional deposit, whether the author chooses gold or green, and whether or not access to the immediate-deposit is made immediately open access or CC-BY.  This not only ensures that the RCUK open access mandate will be successful, but it immunizes it against the following "Publishers' Fantasy Scenario"...

Link:

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/finch-group-defends-open-access-evidence-base/2009176.article?MsgId=197440#MsgId_197440

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Amsciforum

Tags:

oa.new bis oa.finch_report oa.uk oa.rcuk

Date tagged:

11/20/2013, 21:58

Date published:

11/20/2013, 16:58