Fish-in-fish matryoshka sinoglyph

Egas Moniz-Bandeira on Twitter/X:

It's cute, clever, fun, but do the Chinese need it as part of their bloated (!) writing system?

Does Unicode need this inessential / nonessential / unessential sinoglyph as part of the world's functional writing systems?

Selected reading

• "Cucurbits and junk characters" (3/30/24)
• "Another "variant" character" (4/7/24)
• "Polysyllabic sinoglyphs" (4/11/24)
• "The economics of Chinese character usage" (9/2/11)
• "How many more Chinese characters are needed?" (10/25/16)
• "The infinitude of Chinese characters" (10/9/20) — with an extremely lengthy bibliography

[h.t. Geoff Wade]