Political epistemics

Language Log 2016-05-06

Summary:

Several people have asked me about how the various U.S. presidential candidates use various indicators of epistemic status. It's easy to calculate word frequencies as a proxy, so here are some numbers from this season's debates. I've tallied feel words (feel, feels, felt, feeling, feelings), think words (think, thinks, thought, thoughts, thinking), and believe words […]

Link:

http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=25474

From feeds:

Gudgeon and gist » Language Log

Tags:

language and politics

Authors:

Mark Liberman

Date tagged:

05/06/2016, 05:00

Date published:

05/04/2016, 06:52