Arresting visualization

Reader Steph G. didn't like the effort by WRAL (North Carolina) to visualize the demographics of protestors in Raleigh. It sounds like the citizens of NC are making their voices heard. Maybe my friends in Raleigh can give us some background.

There are definitely problems with the choice of charts. But I rate this effort a solid B. In the Trifecta Checkup, they did a good job describing the central question, as well as compiled an appropriate dataset. I love it when people go out to collect the right data rather than use whatever they could grab. The issue was the execution of the charts.

***

The first was a map showing where the arrested protestors came from.

Maps are typically used to show geographical distribution. The chosen color scheme (two levels of green and gray) compresses the data so much that we learn almost nothing about distribution. I clicked on Wake County to learn that there were 178 arrests there. The neighboring Randolph County had only 1 arrest but you can't tell from the colors.

The next chart shows the trend of arrests over time. I like the general appearance (except for the shadows). The problem is the even spacing of the columns when the gaps between the arrests are uneven.

Here's a quick redo, with proper spacing:

***

The final set of charts is inspired. They compare the demographics of those arrested protestors against the average North Carolina resident. For example:

 For categories like Age with quite a few levels, the pie chart isn't a good choice. It's also  hard to compare across pie charts. A column or dot chart works better.