A traditional Republican's case against Dobbs
West Coast Stat Views (on Observational Epidemiology and more) 2024-10-24
A Littleton, Colorado native, Miller started out in Republican politics as an intern working on the 1998 Colorado gubernatorial election.[3][4] He later earned a bachelor's degree from the George Washington University School of Media and Public Affairs.[5]
Miller was an Iowa staffer for John McCain in the 2008 Republican Party presidential primaries, and later served as national press secretary for the Jon Huntsman 2012 presidential campaign.[5] In his role with the Huntsman campaign, Miller was credited by Esquire for making its daily email to reporters "surprisingly hip".[6] After the primary, Miller joined the Republican National Committee as its liaison to Mitt Romney's 2012 presidential campaign.[7]
In 2015, Miller was hired by former Florida governor Jeb Bush to be a senior adviser to his presidential exploratory committee, Right to Rise political action committee (PAC), and went on to serve as the communications director for Bush's presidential campaign.[5][8][9] During the campaign, Miller drew notice as a "vocal critic" of Donald Trump.[10] Following a 2016 South Carolina Republican primary debate, Miller followed Trump around the spin room heckling him until Miller was "hip-checked" by Trump campaign strategist Corey Lewandowski.[11]
Apologies for the formatting, but here are some of the comments that I found worth repeating.
The essential take away here is that the anti-reproductive rights movement (calling it anti-abortion no longer provides an accurate picture) has gone to a place so dark and misogynistic that many people who consider themselves at least moderately pro-life are appalled by what they're seeing. The Harris campaign has made the smart (and I would say moral) decision to focus on the most indefensible consequences of Dobbs: victims of rape; girls so young we would consider them children; women bleeding out in emergency room parking lots. The press has been pushing for Harris to take more positions on divisive issues. Personally I think it is both savvy and right to prioritize urgent points of agreement, and I can't think of many issues more urgent than this.