Governing infrastructure, development and inequality around deindustrialized US cities

Item Type Journal Article Author Dayne Walling URL https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2047102 Volume 12 Issue 6 Pages 725-745 Publication Territory, Politics, Governance ISSN 2162-2671 Date 2024-07-02 Extra Publisher: RSA Website _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2022.2047102 DOI 10.1080/21622671.2022.2047102 Accessed 2024-08-19 04:13:33 Library Catalog Taylor and Francis+NEJM Abstract This paper examines the interaction of regional spatial patterns and multiscalar governance processes of water infrastructure systems and economic development networks around US cities following deindustrialization. Deindustrialization contributed to significant hardships in cities and their surrounding regions, such as increasing blight, ageing infrastructure and fiscal constraints. These challenges combine and multiply in central cities, often alongside population and economic growth in other parts of a metropolitan area. The study applies the emerging infrastructural regionalism framework to questions of how economic development networks and infrastructure systems are designed and governed to distribute value across the urban landscape. The comparative case study focuses on Scranton, Pennsylvania, and Providence, Rhode Island, where the cities’ water infrastructure systems represent two different responses to their changing position in the region. In both cases this analysis shows how governance is fragmented across supra-municipal scales and metropolitan institutions in ways that reduce the power of central cities and that enable uneven redevelopment. The findings inform how an equitable approach to governing infrastructure and development requires addressing regional biases in vertical hierarchies and reorienting public policies towards central cities.