Required content moderation reporting does not violate X’s First Amendment rights

internetcases » cases 2024-01-01

Summary:

A federal court in California has upheld the constitutionality of the state’s Assembly Bill 587 (AB 587), which mandates social media companies to submit to the state attorney general semi-annual reports detailing their content moderation practices. This decision comes after X filed a lawsuit claiming the law violated the company’s First Amendment rights. The underlying…

The post Required content moderation reporting does not violate X’s First Amendment rights appeared first on Chicago internet attorney Evan Brown.

Link:

http://evan.law/2024/01/01/required-content-moderation-reporting-does-not-violate-xs-first-amendment-rights/

From feeds:

CLS / ROC » internetcases » cases

Tags:

amendment

Authors:

Evan Brown

Date tagged:

01/01/2024, 19:36

Date published:

01/01/2024, 17:22