Holding the Line on Anticipation against Eligibility Encroachement

Patent – Patently-O 2017-03-14

Summary:

Nidec Motor v. Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor (Fed. Cir. 2017) In a short and tidy opinion, the Federal Circuit has reversed a PTAB anticipation decision in an inter partes review – holding that the Board’s decision “is not supported by substantial evidence.” At issue is claim 21 of Nidec’s U.S. Patent No. 7,208,895, which claims a “permanent magnet […]

Link:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/PatentlyO/~3/B7Cl9eRv5Yc/anticipation-eligibility-encroachement.html

From feeds:

CLS / ROC » Patent – Patently-O

Tags:

patent

Authors:

Dennis Crouch

Date tagged:

03/14/2017, 18:58

Date published:

03/14/2017, 11:03