Open Access: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly - Bitesize Bio

lterrat's bookmarks 2017-04-25

Summary:

"Will You Set Your Work Free with Open Access?

Increased visibility and free access to all are great reasons to publish Open Access. Yet, most authors primarily consider the journal’s reputation when making publishing decisions, and this is where Open Access has the disadvantage due to misguided perceptions of quality.

If you’re struggling between setting your work free and focusing on prestige, then you may wish to consider the middle road of well-established traditional journals that have adopted a hybrid model to get the best of both worlds. If payment is an issue, remember that some traditional journals charge fees, so do the math before deciding and consider the added benefits of Open Access.

View our webinar to learn more about OA."

Link:

http://bitesizebio.com/34520/open-access-good-bad-ugly/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lterrat's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.stem oa.journals

Date tagged:

04/25/2017, 21:05

Date published:

04/25/2017, 17:05