Open and Shut?: Has the open access movement delayed the revolution?

lterrat's bookmarks 2017-10-11

Summary:

Last month I posted a couple of tweets that attracted some pushback from OA advocates. In the process I was accused of being a species of “Russian troll bot”, of having an unspecified “other agenda”, and then told that unless I was willing to engage in “constructive discussion” I should pipe down. Amongst those to object to my tweets was PLOS co-founder, and feisty OA advocate, Michael Eisen (see below).  Evidently dissatisfied with my responses, Eisen declared that it was silly to make inflammatory statements on Twitter and then say that the platform is a bad place for discussions. However, after a few rounds of back and forth with my critics, I had concluded that it was not going to be possible to debate the matter in short bursts without ending up simply swapping insults. So, I proposed to Eisen that we do a follow up to the Q&A we had done in 2012.

Link:

https://poynder.blogspot.com/2017/10/has-open-access-movement-delayed.html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Amyluv's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.plos oa.journals oa.peer_review oa.access oa.repositories oa.predatory oa.advocacy oa.economics_of oa.south oa.fees oa.business_models oa.discoverability oa.publishers oa.scholcomm oa.preprints oa.obstacles oa.versions

Date tagged:

10/11/2017, 19:37

Date published:

10/11/2017, 15:37