Repositorien für Forschungsdaten am Beispiel der Digital Humanities im nationalen und internationalen Vergleich – Potentiale und Grenzen (Repositories for research data using the example of Digital Humanities in national and international comparison - potentials and limitations)

Kirstine's bookmarks 2017-11-20



From Google's English:

"The importance of digital research data and its archiving has recently attracted increasing interest from both libraries and institutions that influence research infrastructure. A variety of repositories for Digital Humanities research are available to scientists to collect, share and maintain data. The article discusses the quality criteria necessary for the operation of a trusted repository, such as the OAIS model, policies, seals, certificates and self-assessments, in order to provide the users with the necessary transparency for assessing a repository. Subsequently, the repositories HZSK, HDC, Text-Grid Repository, DARIAH-DE Repository, GAMS, LAC and EASY-DANS are analyzed and arranged in selection."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Kirstine's bookmarks

Tags: oa.germany oa.german oa.humanities oa.infrastructure oa.policies oa.ssh oa.repositories


Cordula Franzke

Date tagged:

11/20/2017, 01:34

Date published:

11/19/2017, 20:34