La reproductibilité serait améliorée si les données brutes des articles étaient publiques, mais les auteurs ne veulent pas! ( The reproducibility would be improved if the raw data of the articles were public, but the authors do not want!)

From Google's English:

'I chose to translate the summary of an amazing article in the journal Molecular Brain on February 21, 2020: " No raw data, no science: another possible source of the reproducibility crisis ". Simple, but the editor demanded raw manuscript data  before submitting it to peer review. The reason for asking them is that the article was too good to be true. Well, the authors refused in 20 cases out of 41 requests, and for 20 other articles, the data was insufficient so rejection of the manuscript! See the flow chart opposite, and the summary below:

A reproducibility crisis is a situation where many scientific studies cannot be reproduced. Inappropriate scientific practices, such as HARKING, p-hacking and the selective publication of positive results, have been suggested as causes of non-reproducibility. In this editorial, I suggest that the lack of raw data or the fabrication of data is another possible cause of non-reproducibility.'