Commuting group actions

Wildon's Weblog 2023-04-29

In Schur–Weyl duality one has commuting actions of two algebras A and B on a vector space V such that each is the others centralizer. That is \mathrm{End}_A(V) = B and A = \mathrm{End}_B(V). In particular the actions of A and B on V commute. Using a left-action for A and a right-action for B, this says that

(av)b = a(vb)

for all a \in A, b \in B and v \in V, a fact one would surely expect from the notation. The purpose of this post is to record a lemma about commuting group actions that arose in this context.

Let G and H be finite groups with G acting on the left on \Omega and H acting on the right on \Omega, such the actions commute. For a simple example where G and H may be non-abelian, fix a group G and take \Omega = H = G. Then, for each x \in \Omega, we have

(gx)h = g(xh)

by the associativity of group multiplication. The slogan ‘action on places commutes with action on values’ gives another family of examples, typified by \Omega = \{1,\ldots, b\}^a with G = S_a acting on the left on \Omega by position permutation, and H = S_b acting on the right, diagonally on each of the a factors, by permuting values. For instance, if a = 4 and b = 2 then one joint orbit is

\{(1,\!1,\!2,\!2),\! (1,\!2,\!1,\!2),\! (2,\!1,\!1,\!2),\! (1,\!2,\!2,\!1), (2,\!1,\!2,\!1), (2,\!2,\!1,\!1 \}.

The orbit has size 6 so we expect the stabiliser of points in the orbit ot have order 4! 2! / 6 = 8; a little thought shows that the stabiliser of (1,1,2,2) is

\langle (1,2)_G, (3,4)_G, (1,3)(2,4)_G (1,2)_H \rangle \cong C_2 \wr C_2.

(Here group elements are tagged by the group they live in.) Note the ‘diagonally embedded’ element (1,3)(2,4)_G (1,2)_H: even though we are working in G \times H, it is not the case that the stabiliser factors as \mathrm{Stab}_G(\omega)\mathrm{Stab}_H(\omega).

Since there is no established notation for bimodule induction in the sense I need it, I’m going to have to switch to two commuting right-actions, thought of as a right action of the Cartesian product G \times H, in which, by definition, the two factors commute. Since letters will make it clear which group contains each element, I’ll write gh rather than the formally correct (g, h)

Lemma.

Let G and H be finite groups. Suppose that G \times H acts transitively on a set \Omega. Fix \omega \in \Omega.

  1. The orbits of G on \Omega are blocks for the action of H.
  2. Every point in the G-orbit of \omega has the same H-stabiliser.
  3. We have G\mathrm{Stab}_{G \times H}(\omega) = G\mathrm{Stab}_H(\omega G) where \mathrm{Stab}_H(\omega G) is the subgroup of those h \in H fixing setwise the orbit \omega G.
  4. There is an isomorphism of right \mathbb{C}G-modules \mathbb{C}(\omega G) \cong \mathbb{C}\bigl\uparrow_{\mathrm{Stab}_G(\omega)}^G.
  5. There are isomorphisms of right \mathbb{C}(G \times H)-modules\begin{aligned}\mathbb{C}\Omega &\cong \mathbb{C}\bigl\uparrow_{\mathrm{Stab}_{G \times H} (\omega)}^{G \times H} \\ &\cong \mathbb{C}\bigl\uparrow_{\mathrm{Stab}_G(\omega)}^G \bigl\uparrow_{G\mathrm{Stab}_{G \times H}(\omega)}^{G \times H} \\ &\cong \mathbb{C}\bigl\uparrow_{\mathrm{Stab}_G(\omega)}^G \bigl\uparrow_{G\mathrm{Stab}_{H}(\omega G)}^{G \times H}\end{aligned}
  6. where we regard \mathbb{C}\bigl\uparrow_{\mathrm{Stab}_G(\omega)}^G \cong \mathbb{C}(\omega G) as a G \mathrm{Stab}_{G \times H}(\omega)-module and as a G \mathrm{Stab}_H(\omega G)-module using (3).

Proof.

  1. More generally, if N \le K is a normal subgroup of a group K then the orbits of N are blocks for the action of K, and for the action of any subgroup of K.
  2. Points in the same orbit have conjugate stabilisers, but here the conjugation action is trivial. Or, to see it very concretely, suppose that \omega h = \omega. Then (\omega g)h = (\omega h)g = \omega g. This shows that \mathrm{Stab}_H(\omega) \le \mathrm{Stab}_H(\omega g) and by symmetry equality holds.
  3. The left-hand side is the set of cosets Gh such that \omega g h = \omega for some g \in G. The right-hand side is the set of cosets Gh such that \omega h = \omega g' for some g' \in G. These are equivalent conditions: take g' = g^{-1} and use that the actions commute.
  4. This is very basic. A nice proof uses the characterisation of induced modules that V \cong U\uparrow_L^K if and only if V\downarrow_L has a submodule isomorphic to U and \dim V = [K : L]\dim U. In this case we take U to to be the right \mathbb{C}\mathrm{Stab}_G(\omega)-module \langle \omega \rangle \cong \mathbb{C}.
  5. The first isomorphism follows as in (4) using that G \times H acts transitively on \Omega. The second follows from the third by (3). Finally the third isomorphism can be proved similarly using the characterisation of induced modules.

To finish, here is one of a family of interesting examples that come from taking two wreath products whose top groups are equal (as abstract groups) but whose base groups are different. To be finished.