Commuting group actions
Wildon's Weblog 2023-04-29
In Schur–Weyl duality one has commuting actions of two algebras and
on a vector space
such that each is the others centralizer. That is
and
. In particular the actions of
and
on
commute. Using a left-action for
and a right-action for
, this says that
for all ,
and
, a fact one would surely expect from the notation. The purpose of this post is to record a lemma about commuting group actions that arose in this context.
Let and
be finite groups with
acting on the left on
and
acting on the right on
, such the actions commute. For a simple example where
and
may be non-abelian, fix a group
and take
. Then, for each
, we have
by the associativity of group multiplication. The slogan ‘action on places commutes with action on values’ gives another family of examples, typified by with
acting on the left on
by position permutation, and
acting on the right, diagonally on each of the
factors, by permuting values. For instance, if
and
then one joint orbit is
The orbit has size so we expect the stabiliser of points in the orbit ot have order
; a little thought shows that the stabiliser of
is
(Here group elements are tagged by the group they live in.) Note the ‘diagonally embedded’ element : even though we are working in
, it is not the case that the stabiliser factors as
.
Since there is no established notation for bimodule induction in the sense I need it, I’m going to have to switch to two commuting right-actions, thought of as a right action of the Cartesian product , in which, by definition, the two factors commute. Since letters will make it clear which group contains each element, I’ll write
rather than the formally correct
Lemma.
Let and
be finite groups. Suppose that
acts transitively on a set
. Fix
.
- The orbits of
on
are blocks for the action of
.
- Every point in the
-orbit of
has the same
-stabiliser.
- We have
where
is the subgroup of those
fixing setwise the orbit
.
- There is an isomorphism of right
-modules
.
- There are isomorphisms of right
-modules
where we regard as a
-module and as a
-module using (3).
Proof.
- More generally, if
is a normal subgroup of a group
then the orbits of
are blocks for the action of
, and for the action of any subgroup of
.
- Points in the same orbit have conjugate stabilisers, but here the conjugation action is trivial. Or, to see it very concretely, suppose that
. Then
. This shows that
and by symmetry equality holds.
- The left-hand side is the set of cosets
such that
for some
. The right-hand side is the set of cosets
such that
for some
. These are equivalent conditions: take
and use that the actions commute.
- This is very basic. A nice proof uses the characterisation of induced modules that
if and only if
has a submodule isomorphic to
and
. In this case we take
to to be the right
-module
.
- The first isomorphism follows as in (4) using that
acts transitively on
. The second follows from the third by (3). Finally the third isomorphism can be proved similarly using the characterisation of induced modules.
To finish, here is one of a family of interesting examples that come from taking two wreath products whose top groups are equal (as abstract groups) but whose base groups are different. To be finished.