“Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals | Journal of Documentation | Vol 74, No 1

mdelhaye's bookmarks 2018-08-10


The purpose of this paper is to better understand the theory and practice of peer review in open-access mega-journals (OAMJs). OAMJs typically operate a “soundness-only” review policy aiming to evaluate only the rigour of an article, not the novelty or significance of the research or its relevance to a particular community, with these elements being left for “the community to decide” post-publication.

Findings suggest that in reality criteria beyond technical or scientific soundness can and do influence editorial decisions. Deviations from the original OAMJ model are both publisher supported (in the form of requirements for an article to be “worthy” of publication) and practice driven (in the form of some reviewers and editors applying traditional peer review criteria to OAMJ submissions). Also publishers believe post-publication evaluation of novelty, significance and relevance remains problematic.



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » mdelhaye's bookmarks


oa.new oa.peer_review oa.gold oa.quality oa.megajournals oa.journals

Date tagged:

08/10/2018, 13:45

Date published:

08/10/2018, 09:45