Marketing via Email Solicitation by Predatory (and Legitimate) Journals: An Evaluation of Quality, Frequency and Relevance

aanewman's bookmarks 2018-12-05

Summary:

"Open access (OA) journals have proliferated in recent years. Many journals are highly reputable, delivering on the promise of open access to research as an alternative to traditional, subscriptionbased journals. Yet some OA journals border on, or clearly fall within, the realm of so-called “predatory journals.” Most discussion of such journals has focused on the quality of articles published within them. Considerably less attention has been paid to the marketing practices of predatory journals—primarily their mass e-mailing—and to the impact that this practice may have on recipients’ perception of OA journals as a whole."

Link:

https://jlsc-pub.org/articles/abstract/10.7710/2162-3309.2246/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » aanewman's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.predatory oa.credibility oa.journals oa.authors

Date tagged:

12/05/2018, 12:54

Date published:

12/05/2018, 07:54