Response to complaint regarding Elsevier and their role in the European Commission's Open Science Monitor - Annotate PDF

flavoursofopenscience's bookmarks 2018-10-03

Summary:

Forwarding this:

>>>

Dear all,

As I'm sure many of you are aware, recently around 1100 researchers from around the world signed a complaint regarding Elsevier and their role in the European Commission's Open Science Monitor.

Now, the Directorate-General of Research and Innovation, Jean-Eric Paquet, has provided a full response, available online here: https://zenodo.org/record/1443395#.W7Ta22j0lPZ (posted with permission).

There is also a version here that can be annotated using Hypothes.is:

  • https://docdrop.org/pdf/Annex-to-letter-to-Jon-Tennant-1--BbPfR.pdf/

At this stage, while much clarity has been provided into the process and situation, there are still many apsects which remain unclear or unresolved. Thus, I invite you all to participate in the ongoing discussion by annotating the response, sharing with your colleagues, and contributing your own views and comments. It might be the case that a follow up response is required, depending on how satisfactory the community regards this letter.

Best, Jon

Link:

https://docdrop.org/pdf/Annex-to-letter-to-Jon-Tennant-1--BbPfR.pdf/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » flavoursofopenscience's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.european_commission oa.europe oa.elsevier

Date tagged:

10/03/2018, 13:17

Date published:

10/03/2018, 09:17