The elusive gold mine? The finer details of Creative Commons licences – and why they really matter

flavoursofopenscience's bookmarks 2019-01-03


This article explores the tensions inherent in the ownership and reuse of scholarly works, with a focus on achieving open access (OA) aims via Creative Commons licences. This US initiative has had an enormous impact on the access to, dissemination and reuse of UK-authored scholarly literature since the Finch report of 2012. However, confusion abounds within the funding, publishing and academic communities about the correct uses and long-term implications of using such licences. This has legal consequences, as well as consequences for the author, readers and institutions who have to report compliance regarding OA in order to secure future research funding.  Ownership is an important part of this picture. Creative Commons licences are legally binding on licensor and licensee, and only the copyright owner may release their work under such a licence. The complex research funding and sharing ecosystem has resulted in a ‘policy stack’ challenge with authors given little choice about their options. This paper examines some of these challenges through an exploration of current UKRI policy and the copyright licences of one publisher, with a focus on text and data mining.


From feeds:

[IOI] Open Infrastructure Tracking Project » Items tagged with oa.creative_commons in Open Access Tracking Project (OATP)
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » flavoursofopenscience's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » infodocketGARY's bookmarks

Tags: oa.creative_commons oa.publishers oa.finch_report oa.policies oa.copyright oa.licensing oa.ukri oa.scholcomm oa.reuse oa.publishers oa.policies oa.licensing oa.libre oa.finch_report oa.creative_commons oa.copyright oa.compliance


Ruth Mallalieu

Copyright info:

CC BY 4.0

Date tagged:

01/03/2019, 12:22

Date published:

01/03/2019, 08:02