Large Scale Publisher Survey reveals Global Trends in Open Access Publishing – News Service

flavoursofopenscience's bookmarks 2019-01-09

Summary:

"In 2013, only 35% of respondents used DOIsin 2018 this has jumped to 73%*. However, when publishers were asked why they did not use DOIs the 5 most common words given in responses are: implementing, cost, funding, financial, paying....

The number of respondents providing article metadata to DOAJ has increased from 55% in 2013 to 84% in 2018. When asked which format of metadata publishers would like to supply to DOAJ, 46% said they preferred CrossRef, while 8% said JATS. However, 42% of all 2018 respondents said that they didn’t understand what a metadata format was so there is much work to do here! ...

Our respondents said that the top 3 benefits of being indexed in DOAJ in 2018 are:

  1. Certification that our journal(s) are quality publications
  2. Increased readership
  3. Increased scientific impact

In 2013, it was:

  1. Increased visibility of content
  2. Certification of the journals
  3. Prestige

74% of respondents said that submissions had definitely or maybe increased since being indexed in DOAJ while over 70% thought that traffic had increased to their sites....

62% of respondents said that they didn’t have to deal with competition from predatory publishers or journals. There was no equivalent question in 2013. ...

86% of respondents said that in their countries researchers are evaluated on where they publish rather than what they publish. There was no equivalent question in 2013...."

Link:

https://blog.doaj.org/2019/01/09/large-scale-publisher-survey-reveals-global-trends-in-open-access-publishing/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » flavoursofopenscience's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.gold oa.doaj oa.surveys oa.dois oa.metadata oa.predatory oa.quality oa.assessment oa.p&t oa.journals

Date tagged:

01/09/2019, 12:50

Date published:

01/09/2019, 03:35